Still considering the feedback from the open night and the first group of students. At the same time I need to keep working on the things I know I want to achieve with the space.
I’ve noted before that the difficulty is to keep in mind the developments I want while taking on board advice and comment, especially about the experience of using the space.
Student feedback on geranium – technical
There are not really any comments on the technical aspect of the space, barring things I already noted myself. The sound needs a lot of work and the experience would be more comfortable with a wireless headset.
When the students were around last Wednesday a few of them broke a maquette so I’ve had to repair it. I left it until Monday after cleaning the joints. I’ll have to finish it on Friday.
I also worked on the next iteration of the garden, the new ‘trees’ from the splashes work ok and will probably withstand much more detail and a better material finish.
The next phase, after the group of students on Wednesday is making some new materials from the drawings. I will also make some short video clips to try out the video garden.
On Wednesday I had the final group of students around to the studio, they once again confirmed the feelings of each group that has visited the space. The main thing I take from this is that nobody wants to criticise and people are basically nice.
Last group of students visit the studio
There were a few more comments placed on the board that confirmed the things written above them and spoke very positively of the experience.
I got another video that indicates that as the file size rises the space tends to glitch a bit more, I need to find out if this changes when I ‘build’ the space as an executable file.
It also gives a first view of the new space, in this case added as a ‘next door’ to the drawn garden.
Having got the visits out of the way I’m able to move forward with the things they highlighted, firstly I need to revisit the installation, reorganising it to make the space more enclosed and changing the interior to reflect the VR space more obviously.
new installation layout
I started to play around with arrangement of the space that can provide the more claustrophobic feel.
Following on last Friday I’ve got a group of students coming this week. Monday was spent cleaning up the current file as much as possible. I’ve kept a copy for my visitors to see on Wednesday.
Presentation to Students from Barnsley College 16/10/2019
The visits start with a brief presentation that covers the studio (axisweb, insurances, precarity, etc.,) and then the ACE project and it’s gestation. This is followed up with a chance to try the VR and look at the installation. I then get people to feedback on the big boards.
Student feedback 16/10/2019
The students were generally positive about the work but there were a range of views about the validity of VR as an art form, how well the installation worked and whether the two elements worked together. So far I’m pleased that the feedback reflects my own feelings about the next steps for the work.
I’ve got a couple of videos of students using the space so I can get information about how it is used.
At the moment I still need someone to instruct the ‘player’ as they negotiate the space.
Do I insert instructions into the space, and if so should they be written or spoken?
After Wednesday I spent some time working on the new version of the garden, finally resolving (as best I can) the splashes into 3d models
The video shows importing, scaling and positioning some of the new models. There is still a good amount of work to do.
The video shows the run through as it was on 7th October 2019. This week is about getting some feedback to help determine progression. I have meetings with collaborators today and Wednesday and then an open event on Friday.
NOTES From Wednesday 09/10/2019
Mike Stubbs studio visit 2:30 pm
Look up Geoffrey Shaw, MS commissioned him in Australia, from HK University. Very experienced in VR, particularly dome tech.
Look up Drawn Code, commercial VR and immersive installations, based in Liverpool, have made portable VR installs.
Question why you need a built environment and why it would need to be more permanent, does the built environment have any intrinsic value?
Look up Society Art Technology (SAT) – Montreal they have a dome with 16 cameras, there is a 1-2 week timescale for converting media to run in the dome or it has to be specially made.
Would the installation work as another structure, dome, variable (adjustable)?
For the presentation:
Don’t show the whole video on the VR slide, if you give people the experience they won’t try it out. Maybe bring them back if there is no time for all to try it out.
In the installation:
Bleed the drawing onto the back wall, it makes more sense for there to be something under the projection.
Move the projector up and keystone it to the screen. The text on the back is not happening now so the waist high installation is redundant.
It needs a better sound quality for exhibition, but the installation with the film and sound forces you into your own space. A quiet kind of space, peaceful, spiritual?
Practically you need to tell people how to engage with the piece, how long does it last? Should people stay as long as they like or for a defined period? Does it have a start and a finish time? Put a notice up informing people of these things.
For the VR experience:
Ask people if they have used a headset (VIVE) before. Expect them to say yes even if they haven’t. Use the full headphones not the buds.
Before people wear the headset give them the instructions for movement, showing them the hand controller and how to use it. Be explicit about the direction of movement using this and that they can walk through the screens at the ends of the gardens.
Tell them that they may feel a little motion sickness or vertigo and to let us know if they want to stop.
Increase the speed, or at least the ability to accelerate.
Aside – Look up Damian Murphy from York St. John’s and remember John Stopforth.
Look up NOTES ON BLINDNESS – VR Documentary, about 6 years old was shown at FACT.
Are you going to the Aesthetica Film festival? VR section.
Check out ‘Eyes of the animal’ a VR experience staged in Grisedale forest by Marshmallow Laser Fest and ‘Ocean of Air’, used breathing to nvigate and change size.
You should stage the VR in the garden! – A precise location would help the spoken word element. Keep Writing!
I’ve copied my notes from the meeting verbatim so I have a legible record of the thoughts and suggestions I’m receiving. I have two boards in the studio on which people will write their opinions, suggestions etc., as they experience the piece(s).
There was a suggestion today that I exploit the sensation of VR, the motion sickness, by having tunnels between the spaces – rabbit holes. After thinking about this I’m inclined to keep away from this approach. The two key things I want for the space are that it is not attempting realism and that it is not a game space, it’s not about the ‘wow’ effect but is rather about reflection and calm.
Friday I tidied up the space a litle more before visitors came to the presentations. We had about a dozen people who mostly came for Andrea Berry’s very good presentation about her installation.
I separated and re-rendered the videos for the installation, the six minute version is too large to embed here and set the space up as a close to finished as possible.
The evening went well in terms of the reactions to the VR piece and the installation. The latter is seen increasingly as a thing apart from the VR and I need to work to reconcile this. The best suggestions (closest to my own feeling) recognised the need to make the installation more confining and have it reflect the VR world much more closely, the suggestion is that there should be sculptures in it that are also in the VR world.
I have two groups of students booked in for next Wednesday and the Wednesday after to get a bigger selection of opinions.